Timeline Albums, EPs & singles Songs Films Concerts Sessions People Interviews Articles
Foreground

Saturday, June 21, 1969

Rumor: Beatles to make a Lord Of The Rings film

Last updated on May 7, 2025

In June 1969, Disc and Music Echo reported that The Beatles were set to adapt J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings” for the screen.

The timing of this report was rather curious. Throughout 1966 and 1967, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr explored various ideas and scripts to fulfill their contractual obligation to United Artists for a third film, following “A Hard Day’s Night” and “Help!.” However, none of the proposed projects gained enough traction with the band. Ultimately, the animated film “Yellow Submarine,” released in 1968, was accepted by United Artists as the third Beatles film, despite the group’s limited involvement.

By June 1969, The Beatles were clearly drifting apart, and the prospect of them working together on another film was no longer realistic.

That said, the idea of a Beatles-led adaptation of “The Lord of the Rings” had been seriously explored in 1968.


The [Beatles Cartoon] series ran for three years. During that time Brian made a deal with United Artists to make three pictures. He did A Hard Day’s Night and Help! But the third picture came up and the boys didn’t want to do it. They wanted to go to India. So I contacted UA and I suggested that I could do an animation and they could go to India and everybody would be happy. Brian consented and the deal got a little better for us.

Al Brodax – Producer of “Yellow Submarine” – From MOJO, October 1999

From Wikipedia:

The Beatles were on a three-picture deal with United Artists. Their previous two features, A Hard Day’s Night and Help!, directed by Richard Lester, were successful. When it became clear that the animated Yellow Submarine would not count as part of this deal [sic?], Denis O’Dell (head of the Beatles’ Apple Films) entered negotiations for their third film. He came up with the idea of a Lord of the Rings “multimedia musical extravaganza”, starring the Beatles as the four Hobbits. He learned that United Artists were in negotiations for the rights. In conversation with studio heads David and Arnold Picker, it was decided that a “star director” was required. O’Dell shortlisted David Lean, Stanley Kubrick, and Michelangelo Antonioni. Lean declined. O’Dell left to India to visit the Beatles, with the books in his suitcase. At the behest of Donovan, the band examined the books and began to think “seriously” about the idea. According to O’Dell, John Lennon fancied the role of Gandalf, but George Harrison recalled that Lennon then wanted to swap for Frodo. Ringo Starr wanted to play Sam, while Paul McCartney coveted Frodo. He told Jackson that Lennon would have been Gollum, Ringo Sam, and Harrison Gandalf. Donovan was keen on Merry, and they wanted Twiggy for Galadriel.

Kubrick declined, telling O’Dell the books were excellent, but “unfilmable”. Kubrick had worked on genre films and had pioneered special effects in 2001: A Space Odyssey, but it proved complex to produce, and he had difficulty depicting the aliens onscreen, which would have made him wary of the prospect of rendering fantasy creatures. He was still promoting that film and it was not making the box-office returns that he had hoped for. Chris Conkling and Peter Jackson later said that making it live-action at the time was inconceivable; Ralph Bakshi said it could have been made, but would have been “very tacky.”

Heinz Edelmann, a fan of the book and art director on Yellow Submarine, pitched his own idea for an adaptation to United Artists. Thinking that a “straight” adaptation of the story was impossible, he wanted to do an animated film in the style of Fantasia or “rock opera” with a Kurosawa-like aesthetic. He considered the Rolling Stones to star, but then latched onto the Beatles; however, United Artists wanted a live-action film.

O’Dell talked to Antonioni, who is said to have been keener, but the project never started. The group argued over their desired parts, and Harrison and McCartney were skeptical. McCartney remembers that Tolkien had reservations. There were false rumours that the Beatles and Kubrick talked about an adaptation in 1965. After the rights were secured and John Boorman made his script, the idea of casting the Beatles (as the four Hobbits) was brought back to the table by David Picker, until the band’s separation became publicly known in 1970. In retrospect, O’Dell is skeptical of the whole venture. Others involved had since described the project as “inspired showmanship.”

According to Peter Jackson, Tolkien disliked “the idea of a pop group doing his story” and thus “nixed” the project.


Beatles film! PLANS TO STAR IN FAMOUS FAIRY STORY

BEATLES’ new film is likely to be “Lord of the Rings” — a fantasy-type story based on the world-famous series of books by British professor J. R. Tolkien.

John, Paul, George and Ringo have accepted the script idea as “the best they’ve read so far” and shooting could start immediately — if they can find a suitable producer/director team.

Says Apple’s Derek Taylor: “All four have read the books and are very enthusiastic. After this nothing else seems up to standard.

“Lord Of The Rings” was first published in 1955 following Tolkien’s experimental children’s book “The Hobbit,” a fairy story revolving round inhabitants of the imaginary “Middle Earth.”

Story-line of “Lord Of The Rings,” three separate books, recounts the adventures of star characters “Frodo” and “Sam,” two of the “Hobbits,” who travel under the guidance of a good wizard (“Gandalf”) to return an evil magic ring stolen in the earlier story.

Other main characters include “Gollum,” an evil “Hobbit,” who tries to thwart the plan; “Sauron,” a bad wizard, who is after the ring himself; and “Aragorn,” the god-like prince.

Adds Derek Taylor: “The story has quite a bit of relevance to the highly controversial TV version of “Alice In Wonderland,” produced by Jonathan Miller, which starred Malcolm Muggeridge and Peter Cook, where a lot of things make sense — as well as non-sense!

Penny Valentine writes:

“Lord Of The Rings” seems as likely a vehicle for the Beatles’ talents as anything they have so far filmed.

The story is basically the fight between good and evil, much in the vein of the Beatles’ cartoon, “Yellow Submarine,” though the treatment, to be really effective and not insult the purists, will have to be far less gimmicky.

The “Hobbits” are an endearing set of people who love having parties, aren’t especially heroic, but who battle on in the face of danger. Originally written by Tolkien for children, the books grew in importance to become imperative reading matter at American universities, where “Lord Of The Rings” was part of the curriculum.

They also started a “pop” fashion in Britain — where “Middle Earth” became the name of a London club and “Gandalf’s Garden” the name of a magazine and shop.

It’s hard to suggest which roles the Beatles will take in the lengthy, humorous and sometimes terrifying story. It is likely that Paul could play “Frodo,” the hero, who overcomes his own terror against insuperable odds; John — after his performance in “How I Won The War” — the whining, pathetic “Gollum,” who meets an untimely end; Ringo, the stalwart, sympathetic “Sam,” and George, the tall magical wizard “Gandalf.”

From Disc And Music Echo – June 21, 1969
From Disc And Music Echo – June 21, 1969


Going further

The Beatles Diary Volume 1: The Beatles Years

"With greatly expanded text, this is the most revealing and frank personal 30-year chronicle of the group ever written. Insider Barry Miles covers the Beatles story from childhood to the break-up of the group."

Buy on Amazon

Paul McCartney writing

Talk more talk, chat more chat

Notice any inaccuracies on this page? Have additional insights or ideas for new content? Or just want to share your thoughts? We value your feedback! Please use the form below to get in touch with us.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2025 • Please note this site is strictly non-commercial. All pictures, videos & quoted texts remain the property of the respective copyright owner, and no implication of ownership by us is intended or should be inferred. Any copyright owner who wants something removed should contact us and we will do so immediately. Alternatively, we would be delighted to provide credits.