Is This What We Want?

Track list

Side 1

1. The

   Studio version

2. British

   Studio version

3. Government

   Studio version

4. Must

   Studio version

5. Not

   Studio version

6. Legalise

   Studio version

7. Music

   Studio version

8. Theft

   Studio version

9. To

   Studio version

10. Benefit

    Studio version

11. Ai

    Studio version

12. Companies

    Studio version

13. Bonus Track

    Written by Paul McCartney

    Studio version

From 1000 Artists – Is This What We Want?:

• Limited to 1000 gold foil numbered copies
• Silent album protesting the UK government’s planned changes to copyright law, previously released digitally, is now available for pre-order on vinyl, due for release on 8th December
• Paul McCartney has added a bonus track
• Draws attention to damning impact on artists’ livelihoods controversial government proposals could cause
• All profits from sales of the album will be donated to the charity Help Musicians

The silent album from more than 1,000 musicians protesting the UK government’s proposed changes to copyright law is being released on vinyl, with a bonus track from Paul McCartney. The vinyl release is available from 8th December.

In February 2025, more than 1,000 musicians came together to release a silent album protesting the UK government’s planned changes to copyright law, which would make it easier to train AI models on copyrighted work without a licence. The album, titled Is This What We Want?, featured recordings of empty studios and performance spaces, representing the impact on artists’ and music professionals’ livelihoods that is expected if the government does not change course.

The digital release in February 2025 reached no. 38 in the UK album charts. Now, it is being released on vinyl, with a bonus track – a recording of an empty studio – from Paul McCartney. The vinyl is being released by The state51 Conspiracy.

Under the heavily criticised proposals, UK copyright law would be upended to benefit global tech giants. AI companies would be free to use an artist’s work to train their AI models without permission or remuneration. The government’s proposed changes would require artists to proactively ‘opt-out’ from the theft of their work – reversing the very principle of copyright law. ‘Opt-out’ models are near impossible to enforce, have yet to be proven effective anywhere else in the world, and place enormous burdens on artists, particularly emerging talent.

Facing major backlash from the creative sector and beyond, the government has said its previous proposal is no longer its preferred option. However, it has not proposed an alternative, simply recommitting to its plan to “modernise the copyright legislation”. In the meantime, it has sent creatives a worrying signal, five times rejecting House of Lords amendments to the data bill that would have given rights holders visibility over when their work was being used against their wishes by AI companies.

The album’s track listing spells out a simple message: “The British government must not legalise music theft to benefit AI companies.”

Ed Newton-Rex, the organiser of the album, said: “The government must commit to not handing the life’s work of the country’s musicians to AI companies for free. Doing so would be hugely damaging to our world-leading creative industries, and is totally unnecessary, only benefiting overseas tech giants. It should listen to Paul McCartney and the 1,000 other musicians who took part in this album, and resist calls to legalise music theft from the big tech lobby.”

Paul Sanders, founder of The state51 Conspiracy, said: “When tech companies lobby governments to give them songs for free, it’s not so they can cure diseases, feed the hungry, or provide clean water where it is needed. It’s simply so they can make millions of fake songs and keep all the profits for themselves. As a company with a lifelong commitment to musicians The state51 Conspiracy was honoured to be asked to help get this message out on vinyl. All profits go to Help Musicians, which is what our politicians should be doing instead of sucking up to tech bros.“