Timeline Albums, EPs & singles Songs Films Concerts Sessions People Interviews Articles

1982

The Compleat Beatles

Documentary

Last updated on December 31, 2025


From Wikipedia:

The Compleat Beatles, released in 1982, is a two-hour documentary chronicling the career of the Beatles.

Narrated by actor Malcolm McDowell, it includes extensive interviews with a number of sources close to the Beatles. Some of the people interviewed are producer George Martin, their first manager Allan Williams, Cavern Club DJ Bob Wooler, music writer Bill Harry, and musicians Gerry Marsden, Billy J. Kramer, Marianne Faithfull, Billy Preston, Lenny Kaye, and Tony Sheridan. The film also includes archival footage of interviews with members of the Beatles and their manager Brian Epstein. Authors Nicholas Schaffner and Wilfrid Mellers are among the commentators who offer their views on the band’s career. The Compleat Beatles also features early concert footage, behind-the-scenes background on the making of their albums, and candid footage of their often obsessed, hysterical fans.

Directed by Patrick Montgomery, the film was produced by Delilah Films/Electronic Arts Pictures and released on home video by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer in 1984. Based on the popularity of the video release, the film was later made available theatrically in 16mm by TeleCulture Films, an independent company who previously channeled other small films to MGM for home video.

Video releases

The Compleat Beatles was initially released as a PBS documentary in the United States, and then on VHS, Betamax, CED and Laserdisc that same year on the MGM/UA Home Video label. The 1982 Laserdisc was released in both analogue and stereo versions, as well as being released in Japan and England in 1983. […]

From The New York Times, November 28, 2025:

[…] some Beatlemaniacs of a certain age (say, Gen X and older) consider “Anthology” inferior to another Beatles documentary — one that, because of “Anthology,” is nearly impossible to see legally.

That film is “The Compleat Beatles,” originally released by MGM/UA Home Video in 1982. Its origins were odd, its execution borderline accidental: It was originally envisioned as a 10-minute companion film to a two-volume 1981 coffee table book of sheet music and other Beatles ephemera. A publisher named Delilah Communications hired Patrick Montgomery, an independent filmmaker, to direct, and sent him off to conduct interviews and assemble archival footage for the promotional short.

“Somehow we ended up with a four-hour rough cut that was the complete story,” Montgomery said in a recent video call from his home in Manhattan. “When the owner of Delilah, Stephanie Bennett, saw what I had done, she said, ‘Well, I realize now this is a much bigger thing. Let me see if I can raise the money to finish this as a full-length documentary.’”

Those funds came from MGM/UA, which was interested in augmenting its VHS releases of theatrical hits with original titles, and Montgomery set about completing the film. From the beginning, there was little question about the involvement of the Beatles themselves. “I made attempts to get all the Beatles to talk to me, but they didn’t want to,” Montgomery said. “John Lennon had just died a year before, and everybody was kind of shy about it.”

Additionally, Paul McCartney was already gathering materials for an extended documentary project, then called “The Long and Winding Road,” which would become “The Beatles Anthology.” Ever mindful of their legacy, and perpetually intent on controlling it, the Beatles’ company, Apple, even sued to halt the release of “The Compleat Beatles,” according to Montgomery. But Delilah had rights to the songs via the publishing project, “so they couldn’t stop us from making the film,” Montgomery said.

Many of the film’s fans (including me) think the objectivity of “The Compleat Beatles” — the fact that it’s unauthorized while still drawing fully upon the group’s recordings and appearances — is one of the factors that makes it superior to the Beatles-approved “Anthology.” It’s clearly made by people who love and respect the group, and it walks through their rise to fame and their time at the top with clarity and precision. It also explains their dissolution with simplicity but sadness, and mostly eschews personal relationships and similar gossip to focus on the music and its cultural impact.

Free of the imprimatur of the band members, Montgomery and his collaborators also didn’t feel pressured to sand down the rougher edges of the group’s story, or to minimize their personality conflicts, particularly in the later years. Their longtime producer George Martin, for example, specifically calls out McCartney’s “bossiness” — the kind of candor that is markedly lacking in his “Anthology” interviews.

“I think if we’d actually interviewed any of the Beatles, it would have made a different film entirely,” Montgomery said. “I think maybe because they weren’t involved, some of the people felt more free to talk to us than they might have.” And those who did were able to shed light on aspects of their music that were largely unexplored at the time. The Martin interview, which Montgomery called “the backbone of the film,” offers keen insights into their process in the studio, breaking down the specifics of their collaboration while detailing the curiosity and openness to experimentation that led to some of their most durable songs.

“The Compleat Beatles” has other virtues as well: the evocative yet concise narration by Malcolm McDowell; the ingenuity of Pamela Page’s editing, particularly a late, hard cut from McCartney singing “Let It Be” to screaming Beatlemania-era fans and a young Lennon saying that “we’ll be lucky if we last three months”; and a crisp, brisk pace that manages to tell their story evenly in under two hours. The film avoids the long-windedness and narrative lopsidedness that nearly sinks the multipart “Anthology” (which spends multiple episodes on the early days, then smashes the band’s last two years — their messiest and arguably most fascinating period — into a single installment).

The film was a giant hit on home video, becoming the best-selling full-length VHS musical video program until the debut of Michael Jackson’s “The Making of ‘Thriller’” video. It was so successful that MGM/UA pulled off a rare theatrical-to-video U-turn, mounting a small release of “The Compleat Beatles” to movie theaters in 1984 (Janet Maslin praised it in The New York Times for making “the group’s now-familiar story so very moving”). Delilah subsequently licensed the film to PBS, where it became a favorite for pledge drives.

So why can’t you stream “The Compleat Beatles” today, or buy it on Blu-ray, or see it at your local revival house? “Well, it’s very simple: Paul McCartney bought the film,” Montgomery told me with a shrug. “The woman who owned the film, who owned Delilah, Stephanie Bennett, sold the negative to Paul. And he just took it off the market.”

McCartney “wants to have all the spotlight on the ‘Anthology,’” Montgomery added. (A representative for McCartney did not reply to a request for comment.) And so curious Beatlemaniacs have to go to some trouble to see it, buying used VHS copies or (as I did) laserdiscs on eBay — and, often, the outdated equipment to play them — or keeping an eye out for unofficial rips on user-generated video sites.

Montgomery doesn’t mind. “Look, I don’t have any ownership of ‘The Compleat Beatles’ at all, but I’m happy whenever I see it turn up in chunks on YouTube,” he said. “I’m, in general, not in favor of bootlegging. But in this case, I am.”

From The New York Times, November 28, 2025
Paul McCartney writing

Talk more talk, chat more chat

Notice any inaccuracies on this page? Have additional insights or ideas for new content? Or just want to share your thoughts? We value your feedback! Please use the form below to get in touch with us.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2026 • Please note this site is strictly non-commercial. All pictures, videos & quoted texts remain the property of the respective copyright owner, and no implication of ownership by us is intended or should be inferred. Any copyright owner who wants something removed should contact us and we will do so immediately. Alternatively, we would be delighted to provide credits.