Tuesday, September 16, 1969
Last updated on May 7, 2025
Article Sep 08, 1969 • Paul McCartney, John Lennon and George Harrison discuss the future of The Beatles
Article Sep 16, 1969 • John Lennon tells the other Beatles he's leaving the band
Article Sep 16, 1969 • Maclen Ltd launches legal proceedings against Northern Songs Ltd
Article Sep 17, 1969 • Meeting to discuss the Capitol / EMI agreement
ATV finalizes its acquisition of Northern Songs
September to November 1969
August 1970
Paul McCartney signs co-publishing deal with ATV
Jun 10, 1972
On this day, Maclen Music Limited, representing John Lennon and Paul McCartney, initiated legal proceedings against Northern Songs Ltd, then controlled by Associated Television (ATV). The writ demanded a re-audit of royalty statements dating back to February 11, 1965, citing unpaid earnings from global sub-publishers and public performances.
This was a new line of attack against ATV and its acquisition of Northern Songs. However, it would not change the outcome. In the following weeks, Paul and John agreed to sell their shares in Northern Songs to ATV, which would own 99% of the company by January 1970.
BEATLES ISSUE A WRIT OVER SONGS
TWO rows over the Beatles’ songwriting company Northern Songs are threatening to explode.
John Lennon and Paul McCartney, the two main songwriters in the group, have issued a writ against Northern Songs, which is now controlled by Associated Television. They are claiming extra royalties from past public performances of their songs. Sir Lew Grade, head of ATV, confirmed yesterday that the writ had been issued. Northern Songs is to fight the claim.
The company is also heading for trouble in the City. At a meeting in London yesterday, ATV said that it had now bought 54 per cent of Northern’s shares, many of which have cost them 40s. each. The City’s “Watchdog” take-over panel considers this a breach of its special code on mergers and takeovers and is anxious that ATV offer a similar price to all Northern shareholders.
This would include the Beatles, who own over a third and who said yesterday that they would be willing to accept a 40s.-a-share offer. But Lord Renwick, ATV chairman, said, “We want the Beatles to remain our partners in this enterprise. We don’t want to buy their shares.”
From Daily Mirror – September 26, 1969
VICTORY FOR ATV IN FIGHT OVER BEATLE FIRM
The battle for control of Northern Songs, the group which publishes the Beatles’ hits, has been won by Associated Television. But it hasn’t won the Beatles.
A statement issued in New York last night by their business manager, Mr. Allen Klein, said that the Beatles and their companies intended to sell all their shares in Northern Songs — totalling about 35 per cent. of the company — to ATV for £2 a share.
But he added: “John Lennon and Paul McCartney have no intention of involving themselves in any further relationship with Northern Songs or ATV, beyond the fulfilment of their songwriting contract to February 1973.”
Mr. Klein also said that all negotiations between the Beatles, ATV and Northern Songs had been terminated by the Beatles. He went on: “The Beatles intend to keep all their rights within their own company, Apple, which has divisions in records, music publishing, motion pictures and television. After discussions with the Beatles’ solicitors and after taking advice of counsel, the writs served upon Northern Songs by the Beatles’ own Maclen Company will not be withdrawn and a statement of claim will be served within the next few days.”
The writs concern extra payments which the Beatles claim as royalties on past performances of their songs. ATV chief Sir Lew Grade said last night: “We have already announced our offer — we’re delighted this has now been accepted. We are now expecting some brilliant music from the Beatles.”
From Daily Mirror – October 16, 1969
If we modestly consider the Paul McCartney Project to be the premier online resource for all things Paul McCartney, it is undeniable that The Beatles Bible stands as the definitive online site dedicated to the Beatles. While there is some overlap in content between the two sites, they differ significantly in their approach.
Notice any inaccuracies on this page? Have additional insights or ideas for new content? Or just want to share your thoughts? We value your feedback! Please use the form below to get in touch with us.